http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=7&article=170
Is America Doomed? [Part I]
[EDITORS’ NOTE: This article is the first installment in a three-part
series based on the author’s seminar and soon-to-be-released book—“
The Silencing of God: The Dismantling of America’s Christian Heritage.”
Part II will follow next month.]
The dark, sinister clouds of political correctness have been steadily
gathering over America for some 50 years now. The result? A drastic
recasting of American culture from what it was (for the first 185 years)
to what it is now. In the words of one of the current presidential
candidates:
Whatever we once were, we’re no longer just a Christian
nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation,
a Hindu nation, and a nation of non-believers. We should
acknowledge this and realize that when we’re formulating policies from
the state house to the Senate floor to the White House, we’ve got to
work to translate our reasoning into values that are accessible to every
one of our citizens, not just members of our own faith community
(Brody, 2007, emp. added).
Nevertheless, the Founders and architects of the American Republic
insisted that Christianity must be thoroughly embedded in the citizenry
in order for their grand experiment to be perpetuated (see
Miller,
2006a). But America has strayed far afield from that initial intention
in the last half-century. If something drastic is not done, the future
of the Republic is in question.
What Can Be Done?
If Christians do not rise up and act, the downward spiral will
continue, eventually resulting in inevitable catastrophe. So what may be
done? What would God have Christians to do? “If the foundations are
destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3). Consider the
following succinct listing of seven recommended actions that could turn
the nation around if enacted by a sizable number of Americans:
I. Self-examination and rededication of one’s own life to serious devotion to God, Christ, and the moral principles on which the Republic was founded.
II. Diligent dedication of one’s own family
to God and Christ. Consider homeschooling to shield children from the
subversion of political correctness that has enshrouded public schools.
Return to modeling the home according to the Bible’s directives,
including:
And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart. You
shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them
when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down,
and when you rise up (Deuteronomy 6:6-7).
Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in
the training and instruction of the Lord (Ephesians 6:4). Wives, submit
to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. Husbands, love your wives
and do not be harsh with them. Children, obey your parents in
everything, for this pleases the Lord. Fathers, do not embitter your
children, or they will become discouraged (Colossians 3:18-21, NIV).
He who spares his rod hates his son, but he who loves him disciplines
him promptly. Chasten your son while there is hope, and do not set your
heart on his destruction. Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a
child; the rod of correction will drive it far from him. Do not withhold
correction from a child, for if you beat him with a rod, he will not
die. You shall beat him with a rod, and deliver his soul from hell. The
rod and rebuke give wisdom, but a child left to himself brings shame to
his mother. Correct your son, and he will give you rest; yes, he will
give delight to your soul (Proverbs 13:24; 19:18; 22:15; 23:13-14;
29:15,17).
III. Pray fervently, consistently,
and continually that God will help us. Hold public prayer meetings.
That’s what the Founders did. In fact, during the seven years of the
Revolutionary War, the Continental Congress issued no fewer than nine
public proclamations to the American people, calling upon the whole
nation to set aside entire days in which no labor would be performed so
that the citizens could devote themselves to praying to God (
Miller, 2006b). [NOTE: See the Resources section of this issue for two examples.]
The Founders were merely echoing the Bible’s own teaching regarding the
necessity of petitioning God for national assistance and protection:
Therefore I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers,
intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, for kings and
all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in
all godliness and reverence (1 Timothy 2:1-2).
And shall God not avenge His own elect who
cry out day and night to Him, though He bears long with them? I tell you that He will avenge them speedily (Luke 18:7-8, emp. added).
However, keep in mind that a sufficient number of Americans may have so
rejected God that He intends to punish America. The Founders were
poignantly aware of this very possibility, as expressed by them in a
proclamation they released to the American public on March 20, 1779:
“Whereas, in just punishment of our manifold transgressions, it hath
pleased the Supreme Disposer of all events to visit these United States
with a destructive calamitous war” (
Journals of..., 1909, 13:343-344).
The time has come to face the fact that America may have plummeted too
far in its departure from God’s will to be recalled. Young King Josiah
came to a similar realization when, having discovered the Book of the
Law which had been lost amid temple debris, its precepts largely
neglected by the nation, in panic he announced: “[G]reat is the wrath of
the Lord that is aroused against us, because our fathers have not
obeyed the words of this book, to do according to all that is written
concerning us” (2 Kings 22:13). Though God was pleased with Josiah’s
humility and tender heart, disaster was inevitable:
Thus says the Lord: “Behold, I will bring calamity on this place and
on its inhabitants...because they have forsaken Me.... Therefore My
wrath shall be aroused against this place and shall not be quenched” (2
Kings 22:16-17).
If this be the precise predicament of America, we ought humbly to embrace the attitude of the psalmist when he said:
O Lord God, to whom vengeance belongs—O God, to whom vengeance belongs, shine forth! Rise up, O Judge of the earth; render punishment to the proud.
Lord, how long will the wicked, how long will the wicked triumph? ...
Understand, you senseless among the people; and you fools, when will you
be wise? He who planted the ear, shall He not hear? He who formed the
eye, shall He not see? He who instructs the nations, shall He not correct, He who teaches man knowledge? The Lord knows the thoughts of man, that they are futile (Psalm 94:1-3,8-11, emp. added).
The nations have sunk down in the pit which they made; in the net
which they hid, their own foot is caught. The Lord is known by the
judgment He executes; the wicked is snared in the work of his own hands.
The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.... Arise, O Lord, do not let man prevail; let the nations be judged in Your sight. Put them in fear, O Lord, that the nations may know themselves to be but men (Psalm 9:15-20, emp. added).
When we plead with God in behalf of the nation, our every petition must
be tempered with the same resignation Jesus manifested in the Garden:
“O My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me;
nevertheless,
not as I will, but as You will” (Matthew 26:39, emp. added; cf. James 4:15).
IV. Learn the Bible—deeply and
thoroughly. Delve into God’s Word. Show respect for His thinking by
pouring over its contents. Encourage family and friends to do the same.
The Founders viewed the Bible as absolutely indispensable and integral
to the survival of the Republic, citing it in their political utterances
far more often than any other source (see Lutz, 1988, pp. 140-141).
Indeed, consider the eloquent testimony to this fact, as expressed by a
few of the Founders. For example,
Constitution signer and Secretary of War, James McHenry, insisted:
The Holy Scriptures...can alone secure to society,
order and peace, and to our courts of justice and constitutions of
government, purity, stability, and usefulness. In vain, without the Bible, we increase penal laws and draw entrenchments around our institutions. Bibles are strong entrenchments. Where they abound, men cannot pursue wicked courses (as quoted in Steiner, 1921, p. 14, emp. added).
Patrick Henry believed that the Bible “is a book worth more than all
the other books that were ever printed” (as quoted in Wirt, 1818, p.
402). John Jay wrote to Peter Jay on April 8, 1784: “The Bible is the
best of all books, for it is the word of God and teaches us the way to
be happy in this world and in the next” (1980, 2:709). Noah Webster
asserted: “The Bible is the chief moral cause of all that is good and
the best corrector of all that is evil in human society; the best book
for regulating the temporal concerns of men” (1833, p. v). He further
claimed: “All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime,
ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery and war, proceed from their
despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible” (1832, p.
339).
Constitution signer, Gouverneur Morris, observed: “The
reflection and experience of many years have led me to consider the holy
writings not only as the most authentic and instructive in themselves,
but as the clue to all other history. They tell us what man is, and they
alone tell us why he is what he is” (1821, p. 30).
Declaration
signer, Dr. Benjamin Rush, declared that the Bible “should be read in
our schools in preference to all other books from its containing the
greatest portion of that kind of knowledge which is calculated to
produce private and public temporal happiness” (1798, p. 100). In a
letter to Thomas Jefferson on December 25, 1813, John Adams stated that
“the Bible is the best Book in the world” (1856, 10:85).
Indeed, Americans need a strong dose of the absolutely critical
essentiality of the Bible to both national and private life, as stated
by the Bible writers themselves:
I will never forget Your precepts, for by them You have given me life. Oh, how I love Your law! It is my meditation all the day. You, through Your commandments, make me wiser than my enemies;
for they are ever with me. I understand more than the ancients, because
I keep Your precepts. How sweet are Your words to my taste, sweeter
than honey to my mouth! Through Your precepts I get understanding; therefore I hate every false way. Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path (Psalm 119:93,97-98,100,103-105, emp. added).
For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart (Hebrews 4:12, emp. added).
If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.... He who rejects Me, and does not receive My words, has that which judges him—the word that I have spoken will judge him in the last day.... Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth (John 8:31-32; 12:48; 17:17, emp. added).
The future of the Republic is inextricably linked with and inherently
dependent on the extent to which Americans are willing to return to an
intimate acquaintance with the Bible.
V. Petition politicians, school board members, and the media regarding
spiritual (not political) issues, focusing simply and solely on
morality—not
money. As one steps back and evaluates the moral and spiritual
condition of America, it is self-evident that our nation has strayed far
from its moorings. America is now unquestionably characterized by
rampant divorce, widespread sexual impurity, gambling, drunkenness,
thievery, and the list goes on. Prisons are full to overflowing with
more being built as swiftly as possible, in conjunction with early
release programs. Crime statistics are at an all-time high in virtually
every category. Yet, while sin (i.e., violations of God’s will—1 John
3:4) has increased in the land,
two sins stand out from all others in our day. Two sins, particularly repugnant in God’s sight, have swept over America. These two sins have been
politicized—instead
of being left in the moral and religious arena where they belong. These
two premiere moral issues facing the country are
abortion and homosexuality.
A nation can survive for a period of time even when murder, theft,
adultery, and the like are rampant. (After all, sin is sin. All sin is
destructive and eventually will be addressed by a perfect God.) However,
history shows that when some sins become pervasive in a given
civilization, its demise is imminent. The killing of children and sexual
perversion are just such sins. Ultimately, America’s drifting from its
spiritual moorings is climaxing in imminent moral implosion and
inevitable retribution from God, based on these two critical moral
matters. Please consider them briefly.
Abortion
Who could have imagined (the Founders most certainly could not have
done so) that America would ever give legal sanction to a woman to kill
her unborn baby? Yet, the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court did just that by
ruling that “the word ‘person’ as used in the Fourteenth Amendment, does
not include the unborn” (
Roe v. Wade). Who could have imagined
one day that more than 48 million babies would be butchered in the
United States of America? And that figure does not include the millions
more being sacrificed in the name of “embryonic stem-cell research,” as
well as the millions more lost from selective reduction due to the use
of fertility drugs. The killing of the innocent (Exodus 23:7), and the
shedding of innocent blood—a thing that God hates (Proverbs 6)—are
widespread in the land. If the voice of Abel’s blood cried out to God
from the soil on which his brother had shed it (Genesis 4:10), the blood
of millions of babies shrieking and screaming to God must be deafening.
If you care what God thinks, I urge you to read Exodus 21:22-25,
Ecclesiastes 11:5, Psalm 139:13-16, Isaiah 49:1, Jeremiah 1:4-5,
Zechariah 12:1, and Galatians 1:15. Read the three phases of human life
in Hosea 9:11—conception, pregnancy, and birth. Read where God used the
same word (
brephos) to refer to John in his mother’s womb, and
to refer to the baby Jesus lying in the manger (Luke 1:39-45; 2:12,16).
God also used “son” to refer to John
in utero (Luke 1:36). Read
what is essentially an ancient description of the heinous practice of
partial-birth abortion in Exodus 1:15-22. Read about God’s outrage at
the Israelites for sacrificing their children to pagan deities—a
reprehensible act that never entered God’s mind to enjoin (Jeremiah
19:5; 32:35). The Bible clearly teaches that God possesses personal
regard for human life from the moment of conception. Our own medical
science verifies the same thing. Samuel Armas was a 21-week, unborn baby
when doctors at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville,
Tennessee performed spina bifida surgery on him while he was still in
his mother’s womb. During the surgery, his little hand flopped out of
the incision opening and rested on the doctor’s fingers. Eyewitness
photo journalist Michael Clancey insists that Samuel’s fingers gripped
the doctor’s finger (see Clancey, 2001). In any case, Samuel was born 15
weeks later. Nothing about his exit from his mother’s body, suddenly
transformed him from a nonhuman into a human. He was a human throughout
his pre-birth circumstance (see
Lyons, 2007; Imbody, 2003; Solenni, 2003).
A terrible and tragic inconsistency and incongruity exists in America.
Merely taking possession of an egg containing the pre-born American bald
eagle—let alone if one were to destroy that little pre-birth
environment and thus destroy the baby eagle that is developing
within—results in a stiff fine and even prison time. Yet one can take a
human child in its pre-born environment and not only murder that child,
but also receive government blessing to do so! Eagle eggs, i.e.,
pre-born eagles, are of greater value to American civilization than
pre-born humans (see
Miller,
2004)! What has happened to our society? This state of affairs cannot
be harmonized in a consistent, rational fashion. The ethics and moral
sensibilities that underlie this circumstance are absolutely bizarre (
Miller, “Abortion and...,” 2003).
 |
The combined population of the above red states is equivalent to the number of reported abortions in America since 1973.
|
The number of known abortions in America since 1973 is nearing 50
million—approximately 50 times more than all Americans lost in all of
our wars. That figure is staggering, if not incomprehensible, to the
human mind. That figure constitutes essentially one-sixth of the present
U.S. population. If we awoke in the morning to face the terrifying news
that terrorists had detonated nuclear devices in major urban areas,
that resulted in the death of 50 million Americans, we would be shocked,
panic-stricken, and heartsick. Or, imagine a deadly virus released by
unconscionable terrorists that wiped out the populations of the above
red states. Yet, Americans have tolerated the wholesale slaughter of
that many of its children—entire generations of young people who will
never see the light of day. I wonder if one of those would have found
the cure for cancer. What untold potential and productivity has been
snuffed out by a calloused, cruel, self-centered people! At least the
pagans of antiquity killed their children for
religious purposes, thinking they were pleasing a higher authority. We do it mostly for
convenience—to evade the consequences of the sexual anarchy that runs rampant across our civilization.
The ethical disharmony and moral confusion that reign in our society
have escalated the activity of criminals who commit a variety of heinous
crimes—from murdering and maiming fellow citizens on a daily basis, to
raping women and molesting children. Yet, a sizeable portion of society
is against capital punishment. Many people feel that these wicked
adults, who have engaged in destructive conduct, should not be executed
(a viewpoint that flies directly in the face of what the Founders
believed and what the Bible teaches [Romans 13:1-6; 1 Peter 2:13-14],
since God wants evildoers in society to be punished—even to the point of
capital punishment). So we rarely execute guilty, hardened criminals.
But we daily execute innocent human babies! How can one possibly accept
this terrible disparity, the horrible scourge of abortion? The latest
polls verify our deteriorating morality. An ABC
News/
Washington Post
Poll conducted in June of 2008, reveals that 53% of adult Americans
believe that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while a May
2008 Gallup poll found that 82% believe that abortion should be legal
under any or certain circumstances, with only 17% maintaining that
abortion should be illegal under all circumstances (see “Abortion and
Birth Control”).
The nation has embraced moral insanity. Abortion
is a glaring manifestation of the expulsion of God from American
culture. Mark it down: THE GOD OF THE BIBLE WILL NOT ALLOW THIS
MONSTROUS ATROCITY TO GO UNCHALLENGED AND UNPUNISHED.
Homosexuality
As if killing the unborn were not enough to condemn a civilization to
eternal punishment, America is experiencing another horror of seismic
proportions. Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment
Center in Arlington, Virginia, commented on the issue of gay rights in
the face of a nationwide contest over religious and civil rights:
“Everyone’s talking about it, thinking about it. There are a lot of
different ideas about where we are going to end up, but
everyone thinks it is the battle of our times” (as quoted in Gallagher, 11[33], 2006; cf. Haynes, 2006). A sobering realization. Think of it:
the battle of our times.
Of those living today in America who were alive 50 years ago, few could
have imagined, let alone predicted, that homosexuality would encroach
on our culture as it has. In fact, it would have been unthinkable. The
rapidity with which homosexual activists continue successfully to bully
the nation to normalize what once was universally considered abnormal is
astonishing. And toleration has not satisfied them. Allowing their
views to be taught in public schools has not appeased them. No, they
insist that societal endorsement extend to redefining marriage to
include same-sex couples.
A pernicious plague of sexual insanity is creeping insidiously through
American civilization. Far more deadly than the external threat of
terrorism, or even the inevitable dilution of traditional American
values caused by the infiltration of illegal immigrants and the influx
of those who do not share the Christian worldview, this domino effect
will ultimately end in the moral implosion of America. Indeed, America
is being held captive by moral terrorists. The social engineers of
“political correctness” have been working overtime for decades to
restructure public morality. In 1973, the American Psychiatric
Association deleted homosexuality from its official nomenclature of
mental disorders, the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM),
and the American Psychological Association followed suit in 1975 (see
“Gay and Lesbian...,” 2002; Herek, 2002). Large corporations and
businesses across the country have been subjecting their employees to
mass propaganda under the guise of “sensitivity training.”
Among those who are attempting to coerce the country into altering its
longstanding code of Christian moral values are activist judges. Their
tortured interpretation of constitutional law demonstrates that they
have no respect for God, existing laws, America’s history, or the will
of the people. Instead, they apparently see themselves as qualified
social architects to redefine marriage and morality by usurping their
constitutional role and legislating from the bench. They have placed
themselves at odds with the history of Western civilization. With no
regard for American legal history and the body of constitutional law
that has remained largely intact from the beginning of the nation until
the mid-20th century, they essentially have brushed aside over 150 years
of American judicial history with a flippant wave of the hand. They are
literally restructuring the American moral landscape with an
unflinching vengeance that is undaunted by the widespread national
outrage to the contrary. Those who characterized governmental control
and Christian morality in the 1960s as equivalent to Orwell’s “Big
Brother” are now living a self-fulfilled prophecy—they
are “Big Brother.”
These judicial junkies are aided by politicians from the left coast to
the east coast, who have taken it upon themselves to issue marriage
licenses for homosexual partners. Additionally, the public school system
is being transformed into an incubator for nurturing the next
generation of Americans, breaking down any resistance toward the
impropriety of homosexuality that they might otherwise have had. These
developments were inevitable in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s
historically and constitutionally unprecedented elimination of state
sodomy laws (
Lawrence...,
2003). The high court’s decision was a reversal of its 1986 decision
that upheld State sodomy laws and reinforced the historic stance that
homosexuality is
not a constitutional right (see
Bowers...).
What’s more, no bona fide scientific evidence exists to demonstrate any
genetic cause of homosexuality—even as no genuine genetic linkage will
ever be forthcoming to legitimize pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy, or
incest (
Harrub and Miller, 2004, 24[8]:73-79). Indeed, homosexuality is nothing more than a
behavioral choice.
The Founders on Homosexuality
The Founding Fathers of these United States would be incredulous,
incensed, and outraged. They understood that acceptance of homosexuality
would undermine and erode the moral foundations of civilization.
Sodomy, the longtime historical term for same-sex relations, was a
capital crime under British common law. Sir William Blackstone, British
attorney, jurist, law professor, and political philosopher, authored his
monumental
Commentaries on the Laws of England from 1765-1769.
These commentaries became the premiere legal source admired and used by
America’s Founding Fathers. In “Book the Fourth, Chapter the
Fifteenth,” “Of Offences Against the Persons of Individuals,” Blackstone
stated:
IV. WHAT has been here observed..., which ought to be the more clear in proportion as the crime is the more detestable, may be applied to another offence, of a still deeper malignity; the infamous crime against nature, committed either with man or beast.... But it is an offence of so dark a nature...that the accusation should be clearly made out....
I WILL not act so disagreeable part, to my readers as well as myself, as to dwell any longer upon a subject, the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature.
It will be more eligible to imitate in this respect the delicacy of our
English law, which treats it, in its very indictments, as a crime not
fit to be named; peccatum illud horribile, inter chriftianos non nominandum
[“that horrible sin not to be named among Christians”—DM]. A
taciturnity observed likewise by the edict of Constantius and Constans: ubi
fcelus eft id, quod non proficit fcire, jubemus infurgere leges, armari
jura gladio ultore, ut exquifitis poenis fubdantur infames, qui funt,
vel qui futuri funt, rei [“When that crime is found, which is not
profitable to know, we order the law to bring forth, to provide justice
by force of arms with an avenging sword, that the infamous men be
subjected to the due punishment, those who are found, or those who
future will be found, in the deed”—DM]. Which leads me to add a work concerning its punishment.
THIS the voice of nature and of reason, and the express law of God, determine to be capital.
Of which we have a signal instance, long before the Jewish
dispensation, by the destruction of two cities by fire from heaven: so
that this is an universal, not merely a provincial, precept. And our
ancient law in some degree imitated this punishment, by commanding such miscreants to be burnt to death; though Fleta says they should be buried alive:
either of which punishments was indifferently used for this crime among
the ancient Goths. But now the general punishment of all felonies is
the fame, namely, by hanging: and this offence (being
in the times of popery only subject to ecclesiastical censures) was made
single felony by the statute 25 Hen. VIII. c. 6. and felony without
benefit of clergy by statute 5 Eliz. c. 17. And the rule of law herein
is, that, if both are arrived at years of discretion, agentes et confentientes pari poena plectantur [“advocates and conspirators should be punished with like punishment”—DM] (1769, 4.15.215-216, emp. added).
Here was the law of England—common law—under which Americans lived
prior to achieving independence. That law did not change after gaining
independence. To say the least, such thinking is hardly “politically
correct” by today’s standards.
How many Americans realize that while serving as the Commander-in-Chief
of the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War, the Father of our
country was apprised of a homosexual in the army? The response of
General Washington was immediate and decisive. He issued “General
Orders” from Army Headquarters at Valley Forge on Saturday, March 14,
1778:
At a General Court Martial whereof Colo. Tupper was President (10th
March 1778) Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for
attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier;
Secondly, For Perjury in swearing to false Accounts, found guilty of the
charges exhibited against him, being breaches of 5th Article 18th
Section of the Articles of War and do sentence him to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander in Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Lieutt. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return;
The Drummers and Fifers to attend on the Grand Parade at Guard mounting
for that Purpose (“George...,” underline in orig., emp. added).
Observe that the Father of our country viewed “sodomy” (the 18th-century word for homosexual relations) “with
Abhorrence and Detestation.”
Homosexuality was treated as a criminal offense in all of the original
13 colonies, and eventually every one of the 50 states (see Robinson,
2003; “Sodomy Laws...,” 2003). Severe penalties were invoked for those
who engaged in homosexuality. In fact, few Americans know that the
penalty for homosexuality in several states was
death—including
New York, Vermont, Connecticut, and South Carolina (Barton, 2000, pp.
306,482). Most people nowadays would be shocked to learn that Thomas
Jefferson advocated “dismemberment” as the penalty for homosexuality in
his home state of Virginia, and even authored a bill to that effect
(1781, Query 14; cf. 1903, 1:226-227).
Where did the Founding Fathers and early American citizenry derive
their views on homosexuality? The historically unequivocal answer is—the
Bible. “Traditional” (i.e., biblical) marriage in this country has
always been between a man and a woman. In the words of Jesus: “Have you
not read that He who made them at the beginning ‘made them
male and female,’
and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and
be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?” (Matthew
19:4-5, emp. added). He was merely quoting the statement made by God
regarding His creation of the first man and woman (Genesis 1:27; 2:24).
God created Adam and Eve—not Adam and Steve, or Eve and Ellen. And
throughout the rest of biblical history, God’s attitude toward same-sex
relations remained the same (
Miller, et al., 2003).
In the greater scheme of human history, as civilizations have proceeded
down the usual pathway of moral deterioration and eventual demise, the
acceptance of same-sex relations has typically triggered the final
stages of impending social implosion. America is being brought to the
very brink of moral destruction. God’s warning to the Israelites
regarding their own ability to sustain their national existence in the
Promised Land is equally apropos for America:
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an
abomination.... Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for
by all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you. For the land is defiled; therefore I visit the punishment of its iniquity upon it, and the land vomits out its inhabitants. You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations...lest the land vomit you out also when you defile it, as it vomited out the nations that were before you (Leviticus 18:22-28, emp. added).
Mark this down, too: THE GOD OF THE BIBLE WILL NOT ALLOW THE ABOMINATION OF HOMOSEXUALITY TO GO UNCHALLENGED AND UNPUNISHED.
Unless something is done to stop the moral degeneration, America would
do well to prepare for the inevitable, divine expulsion.
REFERENCES
“Abortion and Birth Control” (2008),
Polling Report, [On-line], URL: http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm.
Adams, John (1850-1856),
The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, ed. Charles Adams (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, & Company).
Barton, David (2002),
Original Intent (Aledo, TX: Wallbuilders), 3rd edition.
Blackstone, William (1769),
Commentaries on the Laws of England, [On-line], URL: http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/bk4ch15.htm.
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), [On-line], URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=478&invol=186.
Brody, David (2007), “Obama to CBN News: We’re no Longer Just a Christian Nation,
CBN News, July 30, [On-line], URL: http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/204016.aspx.
Clancy, Michael (2001), “Story of the ‘Fetal Hand Grasp’ Photograph,” [On-line], URL: http://www.michaelclancy.com/story.html.
Gallagher, Maggie (2006), “Banned in Boston,”
The Weekly Standard, 11[33], May 15, [On-line], URL: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/191 kgwgh.asp.
“Gay and Lesbian Issues” (2002),
American Psychiatric Association Public Information, [On-line], URL: http://www.psych.org/public_info/homose-1.cfm.
“George Washington, March 14, 1778, General Orders” (1778), The George
Washington Papers at the Library of Congress, 1741-1799, from ed. John
C. Fitzpatrick,
The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745-1799, [On-line], URL: http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mgw:@field(DOCID+@lit(gw110081)).
Harrub, Brad and Dave Miller (2004), “‘This is the Way God Made Me’—A
Scientific Examination of Homosexuality and the ‘Gay Gene,’”
Reason & Revelation, 24[8]:73-79, August, [On-line], URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2553.
Haynes, Charles C. (2006), “A Moral Battleground, A Civil Discourse,”
First Amendment Center, May 20, [On-line], URL:
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/commentary.aspx?id=16664.
Herek, Gregory (2002), “Facts about Homosexuality and Mental Health,”
[On-line], URL:
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html.
Imbody, Jonathan (2003), “A Flash of Life,”
Free Republic, October 31, [On-line], URL: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1012548/posts.
Jay, John (1980),
John Jay: The Winning of the Peace. Unpublished Papers 1780-1784, ed. Richard Morris (New York: Harper & Row).
Jefferson, Thomas (1781),
Notes on the State of Virginia, The Avalon Project at Yale Law School, [On-line], URL: http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/jevifram.htm.
Jefferson, Thomas (1903), Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Albert
Bergh (Washington, DC: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association).
Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789 (1904-1937), ed.
Worthington C. Ford, et al. (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing
Office), [On-line], URL: http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage.
Lawrence, et al. v. Texas, No. 02-102 (2003), [On-line], URL:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=02-102.
Lutz, Donald (1988),
The Origins of American Constitutionalism (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press).
Lyons, Eric (2007), “Tiny Babies Abortionists Would Rather We Forget,” Apologetics Press, [On-line], URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/3280.
Miller, Dave (2003), “Abortion and the Bible,” Apologetics Press, [On-line]: URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/1964.
Miller, Dave (2004), “Babies, Eagles, and the Right to Live,” Apologetics Press, [On-line]: URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/reprints/babyeagles.pdf.
Miller, Dave (2006a), “America, Christianity, and the Culture War (Part I),”
Reason & Revelation, 26[6]41-47, June, [On-line]: URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2942.
Miller, Dave (2006b), “Are Americans Abandoning God?,” Apologetics Press, [On-line]: URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/3156.
Miller, Dave, et al. (2003), “An Investigation of the Biblical Evidence Against Homosexuality,”
Reason & Revelation, 24[9]:81, December, [On-line], URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2577.
Morris, Gouverneur (1821), “An Inaugural Discourse Delivered Before the
New York Historical Society by the Honorable Gouverneur Morris on
September 4, 1816” in
Collections of the New York Historical Society for the Year 1821 (New York: E. Bliss & E. White).
Robinson, B.A. (2003), “Criminalizing Same-Sex Behavior,” [On-line], URL: http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_laws1.htm.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), [On-line], URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=410&invol= 113.
Rush, Benjamin (1798),
Essays, Literary, Moral and Philosophical (Philadelphia, PA: Thomas & Samuel Bradford).
“Sodomy Laws in the United States” (2003), [On-line], URL: http://www.sodomylaws.org/usa/usa.htm.
Solenni, Pia de (2003), “Miracles of Life,”
National Review Online, September 30, [On-line], URL: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/solenni2003 09301002.asp.
Steiner, Bernard (1921),
One Hundred and Ten Years of Bible Society Work in Maryland: 1810-1920 (Baltimore, MD: Maryland Bible Society).
Webster, Noah (1832),
History of the United States (New Haven, CT: Durrie & Peck).
Webster, Noah (1833), The Holy Bible Containing the Old and
NewTestaments, in the Common Version. With Amendments of the Language
(New Haven, CT: Durrie & Peck).
Wirt, William (1818),
Sketches of the Life and Character of Patrick Henry (Philadelphia, PA: James Webster).
