http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=743
Historical Support for the Coexistence of Dinosaurs and Humans [Part I]
[EDITOR’S NOTE: This two-part article is the
fruit of Eric’s in-depth analysis of the historical evidence that
demonstrates man and dinosaurs lived together on the Earth in the
not-too-distant past. Look for Part II next month.]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8081b/8081b4bde3405390bb6807d25654a5c77976c8f7" alt=""
No
animal, extinct or living, captures the attention of people more than
dinosaurs. For decades, they have mesmerized children and entertained
adults. Dinosaurs are pictured on television, in books, classrooms,
movies, magazines, and on all sorts of paraphernalia. Advertisers use
them to sell everything from oatmeal to hamburgers and board games to
piggy banks. This animal is so popular with children that it often has
its own section in bookstores. Unfortunately, dinosaurs also play a
major role in teaching evolutionary theory.
We at Apologetics Press feel compelled to write about these extinct reptiles occasionally because
they are the poster children for the theory of evolution.
What the gecko is to Geico®, dinosaurs are to evolution. Consider an
example of their “poster child” status. In the widely used, 100-page
middle school science textbook titled
Evolution—Change Over Time
(published by Prentice Hall), attempts are made to establish evolution
as a fact by using a variety of alleged proofs. One piece of “evidence,”
however, that appears on nearly
one out of every three pages,
centers on dinosaurs. The first two chapters in this three-chapter
textbook begin with pictures and text about dinosaurs. In several
sections of the book (in which the main thrust is not dinosaurs),
students are asked to participate in reading or writing activities that
focus on dinosaurs. Truly, the authors and editors of this “science”
textbook (which recently was used throughout the United States) have
attempted to indoctrinate young minds with the “truths” of evolution by
using dinosaurs more than anything else. Indeed, these animals are so
entwined with evolutionary thinking that in his anti-creationist book
titled
Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism, evolutionist Philip Kitcher admitted that solid evidence for the co-existence of dinosaurs and humans would “
shake the foundations of evolutionary theory,
because, of course, the dinosaurs are supposed to have been long
extinct by the time the hominids arrived on the scene” (1982, p. 121,
emp. added).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dd35/4dd355b91e5b11afeeaafc6e2e8a2969d2c39b63" alt=""
What
does history have to tell us about these extinct creatures? If
dinosaurs and humans once walked the Earth together (as the Bible
implies—Exodus 20:11), it is logical to conclude that humans would have
left behind at least two different types of evidence. First, similar to
how we take pictures of places we visit and wildlife we see in modern
times, people living hundreds or thousands of years ago (before the
invention of cameras) likely would have drawn or carved pictures of
dinosaurs, as well as many other animals. As we have noted previously in
Reason & Revelation, such ancient drawings actually exist (see
Butt and Lyons,
2005). Second, just as we tell stories today of interesting things that
we have seen and heard, the ancients would have told stories about
dinosaurs, if they ever encountered these creatures. Do such stories
exist? Is there historical support for the coexistence of dinosaurs and
humans? You be the judge.
LEGENDS
Often, people refer to stories of the distant past as legends.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
defines “legend” as “1a. An unverified story handed down from earlier
times, especially one popularly believed to be historical. b. A body or
collection of such stories. c. A romanticized or popularized myth of
modern times” (2000, p. 1000). Although sometimes told in a believable
fashion, many legends, no doubt, are pure fantasy. They are filled with
imaginary people and animals performing all sorts of unbelievable,
magical, mythical deeds. Santa Claus flying through the air with his
reindeer on the eve of December 25 delivering gifts all over the world;
Rip Van Winkle sleeping for 20 years under a shade tree; or Paul Bunyan
and his blue ox creating Minnesota’s lakes with their giant
footprints—all could be categorized as legendary characters performing
imaginary feats. Legends of mermaids, sphinxes, and centaurs also can be
safely classified as pure fantasy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3506/a3506d677035ef079598b052e898cc4c42d8cfa3" alt=""
Other
legends, however, are not so fanciful. Stories that are ubiquitous,
included in reputable, historical writings as factual, and supported by
science cannot reasonably be disregarded as “just unbelievable legends.”
Take, for example, the legend of a worldwide flood. Stories have
surfaced in hundreds of cultures throughout the world that tell of a
huge, catastrophic flood which destroyed most of mankind, and that was
survived only by a few individuals and animals (Perloff, 1999, p. 167).
The Babylonians, Greeks, Chinese, Aztecs, Toltecs, and many others have
variations of the flood story. According to evolutionary geologist
Robert Schoch, “Noah is but one tale in a worldwide collection of at
least 500 flood myths” (2003, p. 249). Canadian geologist Sir William
Dawson wrote about how the record of the Flood “is preserved in some of
the oldest historical documents of several distinct races of men, and is
indirectly corroborated by the whole tenor of the early history of most
of the civilized races” (1895, pp. 4ff.). Even the most well-preserved
book of antiquity, the Bible, which Christians believe to be the
truthful, inspired Word of God, testifies repeatedly that a worldwide
flood engulfed the Earth in the days of the patriarch Noah (Genesis 6-8;
Isaiah 54:9; Matthew 24:36-39; Luke 17:26-27; 1 Peter 3:20). What’s
more, much scientific evidence exists suggesting the occurrence of a
universal flood sometime in the past. In their book
The Genesis Flood,
John Whitcomb and Henry Morris spent nearly 100 pages presenting such
data (1961, pp. 116-211). Worldwide stories of a worldwide flood?
Preserved in some of the oldest historical documents, including the
Bible? Corroborated by an assortment of scientific facts? Though various
details in the hundreds of worldwide flood legends have been tainted
over time with multiple errors and contradictions (e.g., the Aztecs’
legend that indicates only two people survived the global Flood rather
than eight), there are logical reasons to believe that the general
outlines of flood legends are true and testify to the Bible’s
reliability (see
Lyons and Butt, 2003).
DRAGON LEGENDS
But what about dinosaurs? Is there any evidence from history that
humans lived with these giant reptiles from the past? Are there stories
of humans interacting with large reptilian creatures that possessed
massive tails, fearsome teeth, hefty legs, horned heads, and spiked
backs?
Indeed, a wide variety of stories of large reptiles have been passed
down through the ages from cultures all over the world. Many of these
creatures sound
very much like dinosaurs, or dinosaur-like (marine or flying) reptiles (e.g.,
plesiosaurus and
pterodactyl). However, these animals never are called dinosaurs in the stories. Since the term “dinosaur” (from the Greek words
deinos, meaning “fearfully great,” and
sauros,
meaning “lizard” or “reptile”) was not coined until the early 1840s
(when fossilized dinosaur bones were first discovered and reconstructed
in modern times), stories told previously of “fearfully great reptiles”
could not
have included the word “dinosaur.” Instead, the name attached to these
creatures was “dragon.” Have some dragon legends been embellished over
time? Of course. Just as people today tend to embellish the size of fish
they catch or the size of a dog that nips their leg, people in the past
said things about dragons that undoubtedly were exaggerations. Such
inaccuracies, however, do not negate the overriding truth that
“fearfully great reptiles” of many different shapes and sizes once lived
with humans—anymore than the differences in worldwide flood legends
mean we must discount the idea of a universal flood.
The Ubiquity and Antiquity of Dragon Legends
Were legends of large dinosaur-like reptiles only to appear late in the
histories of a handful of cultures around the world, one might well
argue for their dismissal in legitimate historical discussions. After
all, what is a smattering of strange animal descriptions and
fairy-tale-like stories interspersed in only a few places on Earth? Such
similar stories of unique reptilian creatures in only a handful of
places on the globe might reasonably be passed off as just coincidence.
The “coincidence card,” however, looks rather weak in light of the vast
amount of testimony regarding the longstanding, widespread nature of
dragon legends.
Many authors are adamant that dragons were purely mythical creatures.
Yet, interestingly, these same writers testify to the ubiquity of dragon
legends. Take, for example, Carl Lindall, contributing writer for
World Book Encyclopedia. He believes “[d]ragons did not really exist,” even though “
[e]very country
had them in its mythology. In Greece dragons were slain by Hercules,
Apollo, and Perseus. Sigurd, Siegfried, and Beowulf killed them in
Norse, German, and English legend” (1996, 5:265-266, emp. added). In his
brief book on
Chinese Dragons, Roy Bates, like Lindall, suggested that the dragon “was never a real beast” (2002, p. 15). Yet, Bates similarly confessed: “
No other creature in the world has had such a far-reaching influence on the minds of so many people” (p. vii, emp. added). A 1981
Science Digest article, titled “The Spread of Dragon Myths,” informed readers, “as myth they [dragons—EL]
are among the most...persistent and widespread in the world. From
millennium to millennium and over all the earth’s continents, dragon and
serpent lore shows remarkable similarity” (1981, 89:103). Still,
Science Digest was adamant that “[d]ragons, of course, are myth” (89:103).
Several others also have testified to the widespread nature of dragon
legends. The famed twentieth-century evolutionist, Carl Sagan, noted:
“The implacable mutual hostility between man and dragon, as exemplified
in the myth of St. George is strongest in the West.... But it is not a
Western anomaly.
It is a worldwide phenomenon” (1977, p. 150, emp. added). Militant evolutionist and
LiveScience.com
staff writer Ker Than admitted: “Dragons are...found in the myths and
legends of cultures all around the world” (2007). James Perloff wrote:
The Flood is not the only common remembrance of the world’s cultures.
They also remember “dragons.” From England to China, these were a long
part of national “mythologies.” The Indians of North and South America
had legends about them. They were written of in Ireland, France,
Germany, Italy, Greece, Switzerland, Scandinavia, Ethiopia, Egypt,
Persia, Russia, India, and Japan (1999, p. 181).
On the inside front dust jacket of his book,
Dragons: A Natural History,
Dr. Karl Shuker noted that dragons “have been found in an astounding
number of places. Dragons and their near relatives have found niches in
every ecosystem on the planet—from the mountains of Greece to the
forests of northern Europe to the volcanic plain of Mesoamerica to the
river valleys of China—and have, as a consequence, become deeply
embedded in human culture” (1995). Shuker even included a world map
showing the existence of dragon legends in cultures on every continent
except Antarctica (pp. 6-7). Daniel Cohen called the dragon “the most
common monster in the world.... People all over the world have believed
in dragons” (1975, p. 97). “A thousand years ago dragons were such
familiar creatures that what they looked like and how they behaved was
common knowledge to every man, woman, and child,” wrote Dr. Peter
Hogarth and Val Cleary in their book
Dragons (1979, p. 12).
They continued: “No matter where they lived, everyone could describe
dragons and dragon behavior...” (p. 12). In her book,
British Dragons,
Jacqueline Simpson mentioned how in Great Britain alone some 80 dragon
legends have been uncovered (1980, p. 10). “Over 70 villages and small
towns [in Great Britain—EL] still have a
tradition about a local dragon, or can be shown on good evidence to have
had such a tradition in the past” (p. 9).
In 2005,
Animal Planet aired a program (later released on DVD) titled
Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real.
The film incorporated legend, alleged scientific facts, various
theories (including, and especially, evolution), state-of-the-art CGI
animation, and the voice talent of Patrick Stewart. It was a highly
publicized film that once again put a spotlight on dragons. Although it
was far from a legitimate documentary, several statements from the film
reinforce the ubiquitous nature of dragon stories. Within the first
minute of the program, the viewer learns:
There
is one creature remembered in the legends of almost every human culture
that’s ever existed. A creature depicted with remarkable similarity by
the Chinese, the Aztecs, even the Inuit who live in a frozen land where
no reptiles are found—even they have stories of this animal: the dragon.
Cultures from different continents, people who had no contact with one
another yet all of them have stories describing the same mythical animal
(Dragons: A Fantasy..., 2005a).
The dragon is “a creature that burns bright in the memory of all
humankind” (2005a). “People that could have never spoken to one another
shared visions of the same creature”—the dragon (
Dragons: A Fantasy..., 2005b). On the back cover of the
Dragons DVD,
Animal Planet
highlighted how “[t]hroughout human history, people have been
fascinated with dragons, which have appeared in the myths and legends of
almost every world culture” (2005a). Although, admittedly,
Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real
was more “docu-fantasy” than documentary, the repeated comments about
the world’s immersion in dragon lore are backed by an enormous reserve
of testimony. All historians and dragon lovers seem to be in agreement
on at least this one point:
reports of dragons are universal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4a63/a4a639a4b3a1f65b7e9f8dbead1713985bb6472b" alt=""
Dragon legends also are characterized by their longstanding tradition. According to
The New Encyclopedia Britannica, “
From ancient times, it [the Chinese dragon—EL]
was the emblem of the Imperial family, and until the founding of the
republic (1911) the dragon adorned the Chinese flag” (“Dragon,” 1997,
4:209, emp. added; see also Bates, 2002, p. vii). In his book,
History Begins at Sumer, Dr. Samuel Kramer observed how “the dragon-slaying theme was an important motif in the Sumerian mythology
of the third millennium B.C.” (1959, p. 170, emp. added). “
[F]our thousand years ago,”
Hogarth and Clery wrote, “sightings of dragons seem to have been almost
as frequent as sightings of whales today” (1979, p. 13). Dragons are
anything but new. Unlike new breeds of dogs and other animals which seem
to pop up every few years, the dragon seems always to have been in the
mind of man.
Animal Planet admitted: “This is the animal about which humankind has
throughout our history been most compelled by” (
Dragons: A Fantasy..., 2005a, emp. added). Though we would disagree highly with
Science Digest’s
extended, evolutionary timetable, notice what the journal suggested
about the antiquity of dragon legends: “[T]he earliest dragonlike [sic]
myths may have originated as long as
100,000 years ago.... As myth they [dragons—EL] are among
the most ancient.... Dragon legends have been with humanity
since the dawn of recorded history...”
(“The Spread...,” 1981, 89:103). Dragon legends are not just cute
stories that our ancestors began telling only in the last few centuries.
They have been told all over the world for millennia. Such antiquity
and ubiquity deserves an adequate explanation.
The Variety of Dragons
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e23c/0e23ccb37eafeba3621a5c4869a99eb7491f028d" alt=""
The English word “dragon” is derived from the Greek word
drakonvia the Latin
draco,
which “was used originally for any large serpent” (“Dragon,” 1997,
4:209) or reptile (Hogarth and Clery, 1979, p. 80), whether real or
mythological, aquatic, aerial, or terrestrial. [NOTE:
The Greek legend of Medea flying through the air in a chariot pulled by
dragons indicates that even in Greek culture something more than just
large snakes often was implied by the use of
drakon.] In
English, “dragon” came to mean a creature that was “basically
reptilian,” though with a variety of possible features, such as wings,
legs, claws, horns, etc. (cf. Simpson, 1980, p. 14). The forms of
dragons “varied from the earliest of times,” but its reptilian traits
were always dominant (“Dragon,” 4:209).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9da43/9da4351aa41d32ead497e19e4015386514eb081d" alt=""
In his book,
Dragons: A Natural History,
Dr. Shuker observed: “For although the winged, four-legged,
flame-spewing horror of classical mythology may well be the most famous
type of dragon in the Western world, it is far from being the only type
on record” (1995, p. 9). Daniel Cohen agreed, saying, “[T]here are many
kinds of dragons” (1975, p. 97). Tiamat of ancient Babylon was said to
have a scaly body, four legs, and wings (“Dragon,” 4:209). Sirrush was
depicted in Babylon with four legs, scales, a horned head, and a
snake-like tongue. Chinese dragons have “a long, scaly, serpentine neck
and body,” as well as four legs, but they are mostly wingless (Rose,
2000, p. 279). According to Hogarth and Clery, Chinese dragons were said
to have resembled each other in nine ways, more or less: “The horns
resemble those of a stag, his head that of a camel, his eyes those of a
demon, his neck that of a snake, his belly that of a clam, his scales
those of a carp, his claws those of an eagle, his soles like those of a
tiger, his ears those of a cow” (1979, p. 53). Western dragons, like the
oriental dragons, had large, scale-covered, elongated bodies with two
or four legs, and tails. Unlike most of the Eastern dragons, however,
many of the Western dragons had “vast wings like those of a bat” (Rose,
p. 104), and some with crested heads.
Wales, whose national flag predominately displays a red dragon (an
animal associated with the country for centuries), reportedly once had
many reptiles occupying its airspace. According to Marie Trevelyan:
The woods round Penllyne Castle, Glamorgan, had the reputation of
being frequented by winged serpents, and these were the terror of old
and young alike.... Some of them had crests sparkling with all the
colours of the rainbow. When disturbed they glided swiftly...to their
hiding places. When angry, they flew over people’s heads, with outspread
wings bright...like the features in a peacock’s tail (as quoted in
Simpson, 1980, p. 34).
After being wounded, one of these “winged serpents” was said to have
begun beating its assailant about the head with its wings” (p. 34).
In the English epic
Beowulf, more than 1,000 years old, the
hero is said to have encountered a “fearsome earth-dragon.” It was
described as a “crooked, coiled worm” that “flies through the night,
enveloped in flame,” causing men to “fear him greatly.” As the story
goes, Beowulf killed the beast, but not before its venomous bite
ultimately led to his own doom (see Simpson, pp. 28-29).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a064a/a064aa92224b9e3c79fdfadcdf7d30505c56d8cb" alt=""
Two
well-known ancient historians documented that flying reptiles and
humans were contemporaries more than 2,000 years ago. Herodotus,
respected Greek historian who lived in approximately 450 B.C., once wrote:
There is a place in Arabia...to which I went, on hearing of some winged serpents;
and when I arrived there, I saw bones and spines of serpents, in such
quantities as it would be impossible to describe. The form of the
serpent is like that of a water-snake; but he has wings without feathers, and as like as possible to the wings of a bat (n.d., emp. added).
Herodotus recognized that such creatures were not birds, mammals, or insects—but reptiles with wings. In the first-century A.D.
the Jewish historian Josephus wrote about Moses and the Israelites
having a difficult time passing through a particular region because of
the presence of flying reptiles.
When the ground was difficult to be passed over, because of the multitude of serpents (which it produces in vast numbers...some of which ascend out of the ground unseen, and also fly in the air, and do come upon men at unawares, and do them a mischief)....
[Moses]
made baskets like unto arks, of sedge, and filled them with ibes [i.e.,
birds], and carried them along with them; which animal is the greatest
enemy to serpents imaginable, for they fly from them when they come near them; and as they fly they are caught and devoured by them (1987, 2:10:2, emp. added).
Although these two historians did not mention the extremely large
flying reptiles, they did record snake-like winged creatures that could
fly.
In the 1200s, Italian explorer Marco Polo wrote of seeing long,
two-legged reptiles (called “lindworms”) while passing through Central
Asia (n.d., 2:49). Time-Life reported how one ancient Chinese emperor of
the Sung Dynasty (c. A.D. 1000-1300) is said to have raised a dragon in his palace (
Dragons..., 1984, p. 57). According to a chronicle in Canterbury Cathedral, around A.D.
1449, Englishmen reported seeing “two fire-breathing dragons engaged in
a fierce, hour-long struggle.” One was black, while the other was
“reddish and spotted” (
Folklore..., 1973, p. 241). In her book
British Dragons,
Jacqueline Simpson brings to light several dragon legends, including
one that in 1866 was reported to have originally occurred in 1405.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90c44/90c44095b0867a0491dedd73391671ad91189d51" alt=""
Close to the town of Bures, near Sudbury, there has lately appeared, to the great hurt of the countryside, a dragon, vast in body, with a crested head, teeth like a saw, and a tail, extending to an enormous length.
Having slaughtered the shepherd of a flock, it devoured many sheep.
There came forth in order to shoot at him with arrows the workmen of the
lord on whose estate he had concealed himself, being Sir Richard de
Waldegrave, Knight; but the dragon’s body, although struck by the
archers, remained unhurt, for the arrows bounced off his back as if it
were iron or hard rock. Those arrows that fell upon the spine of his
back gave out as they struck it a ringing of tinkling sound, just as if
they had hit a brazen plate, and then flew away off by reason of the
hide of this great beast being impenetrable. Thereupon, in order to
destroy him, all the country people around were summoned. But when the
dragon saw that he was again about to be assailed with arrows, he fled
into a marsh or mere and there hid himself among the long reeds, and was
no more seen (p. 60, emp. added).
REFERENCES
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2000), (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin), fourth edition.
Bates, Roy (2002),
Chinese Dragons (Oxford: University Press).
Butt, Kyle and Eric Lyons (2005), “A Trip Out West—To See the Dinosaurs,”
Resources, 4[3]:9R-11R, March, [On-line], URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2705.
Cohen, Daniel (1975),
The Greatest Monsters in the World (New York: Dodd, Mead, & Company).
Dawson, John William (1895),
The Historical Deluge in Relation to Scientific Discovery (Chicago, IL: Revell).
“Dragon” (1997),
The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Micropaedia (Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica).
Dragons: The Enchanted World (1984), (Alexandria, VA: Time-Life Books).
Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real (2005a),
Animal Planet (Silver Spring, MD: Discovery Communications).
Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real (2005b), “Trailer: Dragon Culture,”
Animal Planet, [On-line], URL: http://animal.discovery.com/convergence/dragons/dragons.html.
Folklore, Myths and Legends of Britain (1973), (London: Readers’ Digest).
Herodotus (no date),
The History of Herodotus, trans. George
Rawlinson, [Online], URL:
http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/mirror/classics.mit.edu/
Herodotus/history.2.ii.html.
Hogarth, Peter and Val Clery (1979),
Dragons (New York: Viking Press).
Josephus, Flavius (1987 edition),
The Life and Works of Flavius Josephus: Antiquities of the Jews, trans. William Whiston (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
Kitcher, Philip (1982),
The Case Against Creationism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Kramer, Samuel Noah (1959),
History Begins at Sumer (Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
Lindall, Carl (1996), “Dragon,”
World Book Encyclopedia (Chicago, IL: World Book).
Lyons, Eric and Kyle Butt (2003), “Legends of the Flood,”
Reason & Revelation, 23[11]:102-103, November, [On-line], URL:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/40.
Perloff, James (1999),
Tornado in a Junkyard: The Relentless Myth of Darwinism (Arlington, MA: Refuge Books).
Polo, Marco (no date),
The Travels of Marco Polo, [On-line], URL: https://www.nauticus.org/ebooks/TheTravelsofMarcoPoloVolume2.pdf.
Rose, Carol (2000),
Giants, Monsters, and Dragons: An Encyclopedia of Folklore, Legend, and Myth (New York: W.W. Norton).
Sagan, Carl (1977),
The Dragons of Eden (New York: Random House).
Schoch, Robert M. (2003),
Voyages of the Pyramid Builders (New York: Jeremy P. Parcher/Putnam).
Shuker, Karl (1995),
Dragons: A Natural History (New York: Simon & Schuster).
Simpson, Jacqueline (1980),
British Dragons (London: B.T. Batsford).
“The Spread of Dragon Myths” (1981),
Science Digest, 89:103, May.
Than, Ker (2007), “Top 10 Beasts and Dragons: How Reality Made Myth,”
LiveScience.com, [On-line], URL: http://www.livescience.com/animals/top10_dragons.html.
Whitcomb, John C. and Henry M. Morris (1961),
The Genesis Flood (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian & Reformed).
No comments:
Post a Comment