https://steve-finnell.blogspot.com/2016/10/believing-what-jesus-believed-by-kyle.html
Believing What Jesus Believed
| by | Kyle Butt, M.Div. |
It has become increasingly popular to accept certain parts of the Bible
and to reject other parts. Such amazing events as the miracle of
Creation, Jonah’s being swallowed by a sea creature, and the Flood of
Noah often are brushed aside as mere myth, while more “credible” things
such as the teachings of Jesus are accepted as fact. Although this line
of reasoning might have some initial appeal to our “enlightened” society
that rejects biblical miracles off hand, it contains a major flaw. When
the teachings of Jesus are analyzed, it can be shown that Jesus Himself
believed and taught the Old Testament stories that some label as myth.
For instance, the story of Jonah has come under attack due to its
extraordinary details. According to the Old Testament Scriptures, God’s
prophet Jonah disobeyed the Lord and was swallowed by a great sea
creature. For three days, he dwelt as a damp denizen of that creature’s
belly, until finally he was vomited onto the land and given another
chance to obey God. To certain scholars, the story of Jonah finds a
place in the Scriptures, not as a factual narrative of a specific
historical account, but as a myth or allegory. What did Jesus believe
about the story of Jonah? His sentiments in this regard were
emphatically stated.
Then certain of the scribes and Pharisees answered him, saying, Teacher, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given it but the sign of Jonah the prophet: for as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. The men of Nineveh shall stand up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and behold, a greater than Jonah is here (Matthew 12:38-41).
Quite clearly, Jesus accepted the story of Jonah as an accurate
description of a real, historical event. He included not only the fact
that Jonah spent three days in the belly of the fish, but also affirmed
that the city of Nineveh repented at the preaching of Jonah. If the
story of Jonah were simply an allegory or myth, Jesus’ entire point
about being in the belly of the Earth for as long as Jonah was in the
belly of the fish would be weakened to the point of ridiculousness. For,
if Jonah wasn’t ever really in the belly of the fish, then what would
that say about the Son of Man actually being in the belly of the Earth?
Another story endorsed by Christ is the formation of man and woman at
the beginning of Creation. Some scholars, in an attempt to find a
compromise between the Bible and organic evolution, have postulated that
the Creation account of Genesis need not be taken literally, and that
room can be found in Genesis to accommodate the idea that humans evolved
gradually in Earth’s recent past. What did Jesus say about this idea?
During His earthly sojourn, Christ spoke explicitly regarding Creation.
In Mark 10:6, for example, He declared: “But from the beginning of the
creation, male and female made he them.” Note these three paramount
truths: (1) The first couple was “made”; they were not biological
accidents. Interestingly, the verb “made” in the Greek is in the aorist
tense, implying point action, rather than progressive development (which
would be characteristic of evolutionary activity). W.E. Vine made this
very observation with reference to the composition of the human body in
his comments on 1 Corinthians 12:18 (1951, p. 173). (2) The original
pair was fashioned “male and female”; they were not initially an asexual
“blob” that eventually experienced sexual diversion. (3) Adam and Eve
existed “from the beginning of the creation.” The Greek word for
“beginning” is arché, and is used of “absolute, denotingthe beginning of the world and of its history, the beginning of creation.” The Greek word for “creation” is ktiseos,
and denotes the “sum-total of what God has created” (Cremer, 1962, pp.
113,114,381, emp. in orig.). Christ certainly did not subscribe to the
notion that the Earth is millions or billions of years older than
humanity.
Accepting the testimony of Jesus Christ further demands that the global
Flood of Noah be taken as a literal, historic event. The Lord Himself
addressed the topic of the great Flood in Luke 17:26-30 (cf. Matthew
24:39) when He drew the following parallel:
And as it came to pass in the days of Noah, even so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They ate, they drank, they married, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise even as it came to pass in the days of Lot; they ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; but in the day that Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all: after the same manner shall it be in the day that the Son of man is revealed (emp. added).
The Lord depicted an impending doom that was to befall the Jews of His
day who would not heed the Word of God. For the purpose of this article,
however, note the context in which Jesus discussed the Flood
destruction of Genesis 6-8. He placed the Flood alongside the
destruction of Sodom, and He also placed it alongside the destruction of
the ungodly at His Second Coming. John Whitcomb correctly noted that
the word “all” must refer to the totality of people on the entire Earth
in Noah’s day, and in Sodom during Lot’s time. Jesus’ argument would be
weakened considerably if some of the people on the Earth, besides Noah’s
family, escaped the Flood, or if certain Sodomites survived the fiery
destruction sent from Heaven (1973, pp. 21-22). It is evident from the
text that Jesus affirmed that the same number of ungodly sinners who
escaped the Flood will be the same number of disobedient people who
escape destruction at His Second Coming—none. From His remarks, one can
clearly see that Jesus accepted the Genesis account of a global flood as
a historical fact.
The sayings of Jesus contain numerous references to some of the Old
Testament’s most extraordinary events. A person cannot consistently
maintain a belief in Jesus and His teachings, while denying the details
of the accounts that He endorsed as factual. The testimony of Jesus and
the factual accuracy of the stories He commended stand together.
REFERENCES
Cremer, H. (1962), Biblico-Theological Lexicon of New Testament Greek (London: T & T Clark).
Vine, W.E. (1951), First Corinthians (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan).
Whitcomb, John C. (1973), The World That Perished (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).
No comments:
Post a Comment